Difference between revisions of "Warth v. Seldin"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by JohnRoe (talk) to last revision by NathanG)
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The Court also held that [[standing]] "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal."  ''Id.'' at 500.
 
The Court also held that [[standing]] "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal."  ''Id.'' at 500.
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Latest revision as of 21:34, July 13, 2016

In Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "[t]he plaintiff generally must assert his own legal rights and interests, and cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties."

The Court also held that standing "in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal." Id. at 500.