Difference between revisions of "Science fraud"
m (Reverted edits by Johngillis (talk) to last revision by Ed Poor) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://en.wikipedia.org → https://en.wikipedia.org, http://www.americanthinker.com → https://www.americanthinker.com) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{quotation|'''Modern science fraud''' seems to come from the [[Left]], which makes it especially weird because the Left claims to be all in favor of science. [[Marxism]] itself was a scientific fraud, of course. In 1848 [[Marx]] and [[Engels]] claimed to have a "scientific" (wissenschaftlich) theory of history. They predicted that [[communism]] would first arise in England, because it was the most advanced capitalist nation. (Not) They predicted that [[centralized planning]] would work. (Not) They predicted that the peasants and workers would dedicate their lives to the Socialist State, and stop caring about themselves and their families. (Not). They predicted that sovietization would lead to greater economic performance. (Not). And then, when seventy years of Soviet, Chinese, Eastern European, and North Korean history showed Marx's predictions to be wrong, wrong and wrong again, they still claimed to be "scientific." That's [[pathological science]] --- [[fraud]] masquerading as [[science]]. [ | + | {{quotation|'''Modern science fraud''' seems to come from the [[Left]], which makes it especially weird because the Left claims to be all in favor of science. [[Marxism]] itself was a scientific fraud, of course. In 1848 [[Marx]] and [[Engels]] claimed to have a "scientific" (wissenschaftlich) theory of history. They predicted that [[communism]] would first arise in England, because it was the most advanced capitalist nation. (Not) They predicted that [[centralized planning]] would work. (Not) They predicted that the peasants and workers would dedicate their lives to the Socialist State, and stop caring about themselves and their families. (Not). They predicted that sovietization would lead to greater economic performance. (Not). And then, when seventy years of Soviet, Chinese, Eastern European, and North Korean history showed Marx's predictions to be wrong, wrong and wrong again, they still claimed to be "scientific." That's [[pathological science]] --- [[fraud]] masquerading as [[science]]. [https://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/global_warming_as_pathological.html] }} |
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| − | *[ | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabrication_%28science%29 Wikipedia:Fabrication (science)] |
[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:52, September 26, 2018
Modern science fraud seems to come from the Left, which makes it especially weird because the Left claims to be all in favor of science. Marxism itself was a scientific fraud, of course. In 1848 Marx and Engels claimed to have a "scientific" (wissenschaftlich) theory of history. They predicted that communism would first arise in England, because it was the most advanced capitalist nation. (Not) They predicted that centralized planning would work. (Not) They predicted that the peasants and workers would dedicate their lives to the Socialist State, and stop caring about themselves and their families. (Not). They predicted that sovietization would lead to greater economic performance. (Not). And then, when seventy years of Soviet, Chinese, Eastern European, and North Korean history showed Marx's predictions to be wrong, wrong and wrong again, they still claimed to be "scientific." That's pathological science --- fraud masquerading as science. [1]