Difference between revisions of "Intra-circuit conflict"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(typo) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] rejects [[certiorari]] jurisdiction based on an issue concerning '''intra-circuit conflict''': | |
| − | + | ||
| + | *''Wisniewski v. United States'', 353 U.S. 901, 902 (1957) (per curiam); | ||
| + | |||
| + | *''Davis v. United States'', 417 U.S. 333, 340 (1974) (certiorari not warranted despite conceded intra-circuit conflict on meaning of criminal statute). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to become involved. | ||
| + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
| + | [[category:Federal Procedure]] | ||
Revision as of 00:15, August 31, 2011
The U.S. Supreme Court rejects certiorari jurisdiction based on an issue concerning intra-circuit conflict:
- Wisniewski v. United States, 353 U.S. 901, 902 (1957) (per curiam);
- Davis v. United States, 417 U.S. 333, 340 (1974) (certiorari not warranted despite conceded intra-circuit conflict on meaning of criminal statute).
The reason is that a circuit itself can resolve such conflict without the need for the U.S. Supreme Court to become involved.