Difference between revisions of "Talk:American hero"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
This article is a great idea, but the word "hero" generally is understood to refer to men; the feminine version is "heroine."  I propose that the women on this list be moved to "American Heroines" on the grounds that thee article as it is denies the very basic differences between the sexes and promotes competition between the sexes.  --[[User:LeonardW|LeonardW]] 21:38, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
 
This article is a great idea, but the word "hero" generally is understood to refer to men; the feminine version is "heroine."  I propose that the women on this list be moved to "American Heroines" on the grounds that thee article as it is denies the very basic differences between the sexes and promotes competition between the sexes.  --[[User:LeonardW|LeonardW]] 21:38, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
:Hero is both a gender neutral and Masculine term, and there is no point in dividing up the article. It would do with some Title change for Plural (Since it's a list of people, not just a person or definition) and because that undercase h is bad wiki form--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:40, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:40, August 30, 2011

Duplicate article?

Much of this ground is covered here. BrentH 21:14, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

Proposal

This article is a great idea, but the word "hero" generally is understood to refer to men; the feminine version is "heroine." I propose that the women on this list be moved to "American Heroines" on the grounds that thee article as it is denies the very basic differences between the sexes and promotes competition between the sexes. --LeonardW 21:38, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

Hero is both a gender neutral and Masculine term, and there is no point in dividing up the article. It would do with some Title change for Plural (Since it's a list of people, not just a person or definition) and because that undercase h is bad wiki form--SeanS 21:40, 29 August 2011 (EDT)