Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nancy Pelosi"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Yes, I'm writing more for the Pelosi page right now. And sorry I only just now learned how to sign my posts. --[[User:Go liam|Go liam]] 01:03, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Yes, I'm writing more for the Pelosi page right now. And sorry I only just now learned how to sign my posts. --[[User:Go liam|Go liam]] 01:03, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*Thanks, Liam...you might want to check check wastingtonpost.com for Thursday's lead editorial..... --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:56, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:56, April 6, 2007

Recommend

Conservapedia:Manual of Style/Politicians - Myk 02:25, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Liam....

I don't think a hit piece, without citation, even on one so deserving as Madame Speaker, is appropriate. ;-) --~ Sysop-TerryK MyTalk 22:55, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

There are citations. I'll add a few more.

  • Liam, sign your posts, please. Nothing on her being the first woman Speaker? I think "Criticism" should fall below the other items on the page, eh? I complain about the same things on Reagan, etc. --~ Sysop-TerryK MyTalk 00:59, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, I'm writing more for the Pelosi page right now. And sorry I only just now learned how to sign my posts. --Go liam 01:03, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

  • Thanks, Liam...you might want to check check wastingtonpost.com for Thursday's lead editorial..... --~ Sysop-TerryK MyTalk 01:56, 6 April 2007 (EDT)