User talk:Iduan

M Welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to ask a question I'll be happy to respond as soon as possible leave a comment Some things to keep in mind: Please sign your name using ~~~~ I'll typically respond on my talk page unless otherwise requested I archive whenever a convo is done T A Y L K

2007 (August) (September) (October) (November) (December) 2008 (January) (February) (August) 2009 (January) (February) (March) (April) 2010 (January) (June) (July) Hard work Congratulations. --Joaquín Martínez 16:24, 7 March 2011 (EST) Thanks Joaquín! I'm hoping to have at least stubs on every Supreme Court in a matter of months, and I hope to have the President's officeholder template on every president's page by the end of the week.--IDuan 16:36, 7 March 2011 (EST) Hey, that's some great work you're doing! AddisonDM 17:16, 7 March 2011 (EST) Thanks Addison! And rightbackatchya - you've done some great work in the category space - working there requires a lot of time, but it's definitely worth it; great improvements.--IDuan 17:20, 7 March 2011 (EST) Thanks! I finally finished all the 'wanted categories'. Whew! AddisonDM 18:35, 7 March 2011 (EST) I'm really in awe. Well done!--IDuan 19:10, 7 March 2011 (EST) Hi Hi Iduan, you were helpful before so I'll ask you another question: I made a suggestion here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Conservapedia. Are you able to help? MaxFletcher 23:43, 14 March 2011 (EDT) No sir, I can't edit that page - an administrator will probably notice your section soon; if not, you can always contact on directly (here). Just so you know - you can do inter-site links with [[link]] - so, [[Talk:Conservapedia]] would produce: Talk:Conservapedia. Also, so you're prepared - editing for most users is turned off for nighttime on the eastern coast - it'll probably happen within the hour.--IDuan 00:00, 15 March 2011 (EDT) Battle of wills Regarding this, et al., I blocked user:WillS pending his submission of a writing plan. Several recent edits are thinly disguised attempts at sabotage, methinks. --Ed Poor Talk 00:38, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Ahh thanks Ed! I agree. He might've had one or two valuable edits but otherwise they strike me as troublesome as well.--IDuan 01:29, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Also - clever headline - lol I just noticed that.--IDuan 01:31, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Thanks for your help Thanks for your help in reverting. I had to pop out quickly but came back to find it taken care of. MaxFletcher 18:16, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Yes, thank you for reverting all of the vandalism, including the vandalism to my user and talk pages. DavidE 14:05, 18 March 2011 (EDT) Thanks for looking after my user page too. CharlieJ 19:33, 18 March 2011 (EDT) No problem all; good work yourself, Max--IDuan 23:23, 18 March 2011 (EDT) Thank You Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. That troll scared me for a while. Gregkochuconn 09:43, 23 March 2011 (EDT) Not a problem :) --IDuan 10:09, 23 March 2011 (EDT) Block Could you take a look at the user's page? He claims that he wrote the material that appears on other sites, and hence he can copy it.--Andy Schlafly 00:43, 27 March 2011 (EDT) The pages that were on A Storehouse of Knowledge were copied from what he wrote on a vandal wiki, I wasn't sure if we allowed that - but i'll unblock. Sorry and thanks for the heads up--IDuan 00:47, 27 March 2011 (EDT) Thanks for unblocking me. Please ignore the email I sent you, it is resolved. Just for the record, I edit at aSK, I also edit at that other Wiki you mention. I know a lot of people there have targeted this site with vandalism, but I actually believe in trying to engage constructively rather than vandalising things. I will copy articles around, but only (1) where I wrote them myself (as opposed to someone else) (2) when I believe in my judgement its compatible with the receiving wikis views or objectives (if I get that wrong sometimes - I'm sure I will - please excuse me.) --Maratrean 00:55, 27 March 2011 (EDT) Already responded to the email :) sorry about the block.--IDuan 00:57, 27 March 2011 (EDT) Supreme Court history articles Where are them? --Joaquín Martínez 22:59, 29 April 2011 (EDT) Well they're just on the justices, but the only place you can see them is at Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States - just scroll to the bottom and click "show" on the template :) --IDuan 23:16, 29 April 2011 (EDT) Excellent work, congratulations. --Joaquín Martínez 08:38, 30 April 2011 (EDT) There are actually a lot of articles without images - so if you could find those that would make them look infinitely better!--IDuan 23:26, 29 April 2011 (EDT) Editing Liberal Friendship The edits were to correct erroneous information, remove opinion, and to put tags in to get citations for claims that were unsourced. I was under the impression that's what we do with an encyclopedia. This site isnt here to smear people. HarabecW First of all please sign your posts with --~~~~ - it'll leave an automatic time-stamped signature. Secondly, this is an encyclopedia written from a conservative perspective - that's crucial for you to understand if you want to continue editing here. Thirdly, unless you have very good reason you do not revert administrators, and lastly, if you are reverted - the correct response is NOT to revert back - that's called edit warring - you've done it twice now (with Karajou and with me) and I'm quite willing to take punitive measures if you do it again.--IDuan 17:36, 8 May 2011 (EDT) my edit You do know that you should include Nixon acts for the Enviroment. It seems that any things that even sounds liberal you delete even of it is a fact. You can't slant facts. As I don't have as much time as you seem to have you should also include he ended the draft.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Conservative134 (talk) Congress ended the draft, not Nixon. Karajou 15:10, 11 May 2011 (EDT) I reverted you (here) not for your content but because you very clearly copied from Wikipedia. You even left the citation number in (that stray "[108]"? I know what that is). So let's be clear, I reverted your edit because it was half-assed plagiarism - it had nothing to do with content censorship. Also, new sections go on the bottom of talk pages and you should sign your edits (--~~~~).--IDuan 16:01, 11 May 2011 (EDT)