User talk:Iduan

M Welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to ask a question I'll be happy to respond as soon as possible leave a comment Some things to keep in mind: Please sign your name using ~~~~ I'll typically respond on my talk page unless otherwise requested I archive whenever a convo is done T A Y L K

2007 (August) (September) (October) (November) (December) 2008 (January) (February) (August) 2009 (January) (February) (March) (April) 2010 (January) (June) (July) Hard work Congratulations. --Joaquín Martínez 16:24, 7 March 2011 (EST) Thanks Joaquín! I'm hoping to have at least stubs on every Supreme Court in a matter of months, and I hope to have the President's officeholder template on every president's page by the end of the week.--IDuan 16:36, 7 March 2011 (EST) Hey, that's some great work you're doing! AddisonDM 17:16, 7 March 2011 (EST) Thanks Addison! And rightbackatchya - you've done some great work in the category space - working there requires a lot of time, but it's definitely worth it; great improvements.--IDuan 17:20, 7 March 2011 (EST) Thanks! I finally finished all the 'wanted categories'. Whew! AddisonDM 18:35, 7 March 2011 (EST) I'm really in awe. Well done!--IDuan 19:10, 7 March 2011 (EST) Hi Hi Iduan, you were helpful before so I'll ask you another question: I made a suggestion here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Conservapedia. Are you able to help? MaxFletcher 23:43, 14 March 2011 (EDT) No sir, I can't edit that page - an administrator will probably notice your section soon; if not, you can always contact on directly (here). Just so you know - you can do inter-site links with [[link]] - so, [[Talk:Conservapedia]] would produce: Talk:Conservapedia. Also, so you're prepared - editing for most users is turned off for nighttime on the eastern coast - it'll probably happen within the hour.--IDuan 00:00, 15 March 2011 (EDT) Battle of wills Regarding this, et al., I blocked user:WillS pending his submission of a writing plan. Several recent edits are thinly disguised attempts at sabotage, methinks. --Ed Poor Talk 00:38, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Ahh thanks Ed! I agree. He might've had one or two valuable edits but otherwise they strike me as troublesome as well.--IDuan 01:29, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Also - clever headline - lol I just noticed that.--IDuan 01:31, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Thanks for your help Thanks for your help in reverting. I had to pop out quickly but came back to find it taken care of. MaxFletcher 18:16, 17 March 2011 (EDT) Yes, thank you for reverting all of the vandalism, including the vandalism to my user and talk pages. DavidE 14:05, 18 March 2011 (EDT) Thanks for looking after my user page too. CharlieJ 19:33, 18 March 2011 (EDT) No problem all; good work yourself, Max--IDuan 23:23, 18 March 2011 (EDT) Thank You Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. That troll scared me for a while. Gregkochuconn 09:43, 23 March 2011 (EDT) Not a problem :) --IDuan 10:09, 23 March 2011 (EDT) Block Could you take a look at the user's page? He claims that he wrote the material that appears on other sites, and hence he can copy it.--Andy Schlafly 00:43, 27 March 2011 (EDT) The pages that were on A Storehouse of Knowledge were copied from what he wrote on a vandal wiki, I wasn't sure if we allowed that - but i'll unblock. Sorry and thanks for the heads up--IDuan 00:47, 27 March 2011 (EDT) Thanks for unblocking me. Please ignore the email I sent you, it is resolved. Just for the record, I edit at aSK, I also edit at that other Wiki you mention. I know a lot of people there have targeted this site with vandalism, but I actually believe in trying to engage constructively rather than vandalising things. I will copy articles around, but only (1) where I wrote them myself (as opposed to someone else) (2) when I believe in my judgement its compatible with the receiving wikis views or objectives (if I get that wrong sometimes - I'm sure I will - please excuse me.) --Maratrean 00:55, 27 March 2011 (EDT) Already responded to the email :) sorry about the block.--IDuan 00:57, 27 March 2011 (EDT) Supreme Court history articles Where are them? --Joaquín Martínez 22:59, 29 April 2011 (EDT) Well they're just on the justices, but the only place you can see them is at Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States - just scroll to the bottom and click "show" on the template :) --IDuan 23:16, 29 April 2011 (EDT) Excellent work, congratulations. --Joaquín Martínez 08:38, 30 April 2011 (EDT) There are actually a lot of articles without images - so if you could find those that would make them look infinitely better!--IDuan 23:26, 29 April 2011 (EDT) Editing Liberal Friendship The edits were to correct erroneous information, remove opinion, and to put tags in to get citations for claims that were unsourced. I was under the impression that's what we do with an encyclopedia. This site isnt here to smear people. HarabecW First of all please sign your posts with --~~~~ - it'll leave an automatic time-stamped signature. Secondly, this is an encyclopedia written from a conservative perspective - that's crucial for you to understand if you want to continue editing here. Thirdly, unless you have very good reason you do not revert administrators, and lastly, if you are reverted - the correct response is NOT to revert back - that's called edit warring - you've done it twice now (with Karajou and with me) and I'm quite willing to take punitive measures if you do it again.--IDuan 17:36, 8 May 2011 (EDT)