Difference between revisions of "User talk:CecilQ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Useful links
MaxFletcher (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Cecil, I noticed you'be been here about a month and you've only contributed to talk pages. That's fine but perhaps there are some substantive articles you can work on? Thanks. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:05, 8 March 2011 (EST) | Cecil, I noticed you'be been here about a month and you've only contributed to talk pages. That's fine but perhaps there are some substantive articles you can work on? Thanks. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:05, 8 March 2011 (EST) | ||
: Thanks for the comment. At the moment I am trying to make a change to the "Deliberate Ignorance" article but I am a bit reluctant to just charge in and make the change when there are others who seem to take a differing view. In the future should I just make the change and then discuss if there is some disagreement? Sorry, I'm a bit new at this. --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 20:09, 8 March 2011 (EST) | : Thanks for the comment. At the moment I am trying to make a change to the "Deliberate Ignorance" article but I am a bit reluctant to just charge in and make the change when there are others who seem to take a differing view. In the future should I just make the change and then discuss if there is some disagreement? Sorry, I'm a bit new at this. --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 20:09, 8 March 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | You have continued to argue despite being provided with several responses. Please take a break. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:45, 27 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:45, March 27, 2011
Welcome!
Hello, CecilQ, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, CecilQ!
Contributions
Cecil, I noticed you'be been here about a month and you've only contributed to talk pages. That's fine but perhaps there are some substantive articles you can work on? Thanks. AddisonDM 20:05, 8 March 2011 (EST)
- Thanks for the comment. At the moment I am trying to make a change to the "Deliberate Ignorance" article but I am a bit reluctant to just charge in and make the change when there are others who seem to take a differing view. In the future should I just make the change and then discuss if there is some disagreement? Sorry, I'm a bit new at this. --CecilQ 20:09, 8 March 2011 (EST)
You have continued to argue despite being provided with several responses. Please take a break. MaxFletcher 17:45, 27 March 2011 (EDT)