Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flat Earth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MountainDew (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::::Terrapinism is an ''excellent'' idea. I'm surprised it doesn't have an article yet. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:10, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | :::::Terrapinism is an ''excellent'' idea. I'm surprised it doesn't have an article yet. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:10, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
::::::I can't imagine why we should want a frivolous article on something like "Terrapinism". Perhaps a mention under "discworld" might be appropriate, but a full article would be nothing other than a grotesque parody of sincerely held Christian beliefs. I have doubts about whether some contributors are taking this issue with the necessary seriousness.--[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 03:30, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | ::::::I can't imagine why we should want a frivolous article on something like "Terrapinism". Perhaps a mention under "discworld" might be appropriate, but a full article would be nothing other than a grotesque parody of sincerely held Christian beliefs. I have doubts about whether some contributors are taking this issue with the necessary seriousness.--[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 03:30, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree, Bill. People are parroting skeptical arguments, which do have good answers from Christian apologists, just to make Christians look stupid. Just look at which articles some of these people are editing and what they're saying. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 03:31, 2 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:31, April 2, 2007
Wait.... now you're insisting that the Bible _isn't_ to be taken literally at all times? Who are you, and what have you done with Rschlafly? And do you need any help disposing of the evidence? --BDobbs 17:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- While the bible is literally true the passages which seem to refer to a "flat earth" have generally be the subject of "quote mining" and taken out of context.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:53, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- Man, those evolutionists seriously shouldn't be trusted. *putting it on watch for potential article improvement drive later next week (if it stays this way for a few days)* --Sid 3050 17:55, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- I dunno about that. Satan taking Jesus up where he can see ALL the countries of the world seems pretty straightforward to me. --BDobbs 17:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- The article would certainly benefit from being structured in a more Christian format Sid. I trust that you will sincerely try to improve it in this manner. --bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:59, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- I dunno about that. Satan taking Jesus up where he can see ALL the countries of the world seems pretty straightforward to me. --BDobbs 17:57, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, we need equal treatment for the Scientific Geo-terrapinism theory and the so-called "Round Earth Theory" that the Secular Humanists are trying to foist upon us and shout down any dissenters about. --BDobbs 18:01, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- Terrapinism is an excellent idea. I'm surprised it doesn't have an article yet. --Sid 3050 18:10, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- I can't imagine why we should want a frivolous article on something like "Terrapinism". Perhaps a mention under "discworld" might be appropriate, but a full article would be nothing other than a grotesque parody of sincerely held Christian beliefs. I have doubts about whether some contributors are taking this issue with the necessary seriousness.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 03:30, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
- Terrapinism is an excellent idea. I'm surprised it doesn't have an article yet. --Sid 3050 18:10, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
I agree, Bill. People are parroting skeptical arguments, which do have good answers from Christian apologists, just to make Christians look stupid. Just look at which articles some of these people are editing and what they're saying. MountainDew 03:31, 2 April 2007 (EDT)