Difference between revisions of "User talk:EMorris"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{welcome|sig=<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)}}
 
{{welcome|sig=<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)}}
  
−
Please try to make your points without violating our rules.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:25, 15 February 2010 (EST)
 
−
 
−
Don't say [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dennis_Kucinich&diff=prev&oldid=754574 grammatical error] when you mean typo. It makes us trust you less. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:50, 10 March 2010 (EST)
 
−
 
−
: That doesn't make much sense, Ed. I won't argue with you about the difference between the two, but either way, it's not some terrible distortion of facts or vandalism of the site. Even if I was wrong, it's an honest mistake. I wrote an entire quality article on here and haven't vandalized anything. If your trust is that fragile, I think you have a problem. [[User:EMorris|EMorris]] 14:59, 26 May 2010 (EDT)
 
  
 
== Your userpage ==
 
== Your userpage ==

Revision as of 21:59, August 11, 2010

Welcome!

Hello, EMorris, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, EMorris!


ṬK/Admin/Talk 02:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)


Your userpage

Not to nitpick, but I'm asking you to take some of the cynicism and negative tone from your userpage. It really doesn't help you as an editor if your opening sentence is calling out another user.--IDuan 18:36, 3 June 2010 (EDT)

(P.s. - in my first post I questioned why you were listing your contribution to the article on perfect games as major - I took a quick glance at the edit summary and only saw your edit after User:TK's updating the article - I didn't go further back until after the post, and now I realize that you created the article - very sorry about that - a compliment (great job!) is due rather than the questioning I originally posted--IDuan 18:39, 3 June 2010 (EDT))
No problem, Duan. The perfect game article is not major at all, and I didn't even add the chart, so it didn't take a lot of work. I just added it to show that I am making real and valid contributions, even if they're not huge ones. EMorris 15:36, 4 June 2010 (EDT)