Difference between revisions of "Talk:Genocide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(What is is this supposed to mean?) |
(A very important word of caution) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::''but has yet to take any concrete steps to resolve.'' | :::''but has yet to take any concrete steps to resolve.'' | ||
::What is is this supposed to mean, is the US govt supposed to bring vicitms back from the grave in order to "resolve" a genocide? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ::What is is this supposed to mean, is the US govt supposed to bring vicitms back from the grave in order to "resolve" a genocide? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Word of caution== | ||
| + | I would caution against over reliance upon citations to the United Nations as being some sort of authoritve or definitive source on this subject; this may have the unintended consequence of nobody taking an issue of such vital importance as serious at all. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:02, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:02, April 7, 2007
Genocide can refer to the killing of cultural, political, or religious groups too. Thanks. [1] --WOVcenter 01:09, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- I thought that that was referred to as ethnocide. Still, it usually ends up the same, though. Wikinterpreter
- Deleted phrase
- but has yet to take any concrete steps to resolve.
- What is is this supposed to mean, is the US govt supposed to bring vicitms back from the grave in order to "resolve" a genocide? RobS 20:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- Deleted phrase
Word of caution
I would caution against over reliance upon citations to the United Nations as being some sort of authoritve or definitive source on this subject; this may have the unintended consequence of nobody taking an issue of such vital importance as serious at all. RobS 14:02, 7 April 2007 (EDT)