Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flat Earth"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Who are you, and what have you done with Rschlafly?  And do you need any help disposing of the evidence?  --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 17:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Who are you, and what have you done with Rschlafly?  And do you need any help disposing of the evidence?  --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 17:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:While the bible is literally true the passages which seem to refer to a "flat earth" have generally be the subject of "[[quote mining]]" and taken out of context.--[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:53, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:While the bible is literally true the passages which seem to refer to a "flat earth" have generally be the subject of "[[quote mining]]" and taken out of context.--[[User:Bill M|bill m]] 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:53, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
−
::Man, those evolutionists seriously shouldn't be trusted. *putting it on watch for potential article improvement drive later next week* --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:55, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::Man, those evolutionists seriously shouldn't be trusted. *putting it on watch for potential article improvement drive later next week (if it stays this way for a few days)* --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:55, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:55, April 1, 2007

Wait.... now you're insisting that the Bible _isn't_ to be taken literally at all times? Who are you, and what have you done with Rschlafly? And do you need any help disposing of the evidence? --BDobbs 17:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

While the bible is literally true the passages which seem to refer to a "flat earth" have generally be the subject of "quote mining" and taken out of context.--bill m 12:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT) 17:53, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
Man, those evolutionists seriously shouldn't be trusted. *putting it on watch for potential article improvement drive later next week (if it stays this way for a few days)* --Sid 3050 17:55, 1 April 2007 (EDT)