Difference between revisions of "Liberal charity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(But as liberals increase the size of government and squeeze charity out of culture, all forms of charity, including ones that government cannot provide, decline.)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Several liberal belief systems are particularly uncharitable.  No [[atheist]]s build hospitals and there is no meaningful public charity work performed by [[homosexual]] groups.  [[Feminist]]s are also notoriously uncharitable.
 
Several liberal belief systems are particularly uncharitable.  No [[atheist]]s build hospitals and there is no meaningful public charity work performed by [[homosexual]] groups.  [[Feminist]]s are also notoriously uncharitable.
  
−
Several liberal-promoted charities, such as Susan G. Komen, even send donated funds to anti-life groups like [[Planned Parenthood]] affiliates that promote [[abortions]].
+
Several liberal-promoted charities, such as Susan G. Komen, even send donated funds to anti-life groups like [[Planned Parenthood]] affiliates that promote [[abortion]].
 +
 
 +
Note that there are some services for which government cannot replace private charity, in a free society.  Blood donations are an example of something that government can never provide.  But as liberals increase the size of government and squeeze charity out of culture, all forms of charity, including ones that government cannot provide, decline.

Revision as of 21:54, April 8, 2010

Liberal charity is an oxymoron because liberals give to charity at much lower rates than conservatives. Instead, liberals attempt to replace charity with government power and control.

Several liberal belief systems are particularly uncharitable. No atheists build hospitals and there is no meaningful public charity work performed by homosexual groups. Feminists are also notoriously uncharitable.

Several liberal-promoted charities, such as Susan G. Komen, even send donated funds to anti-life groups like Planned Parenthood affiliates that promote abortion.

Note that there are some services for which government cannot replace private charity, in a free society. Blood donations are an example of something that government can never provide. But as liberals increase the size of government and squeeze charity out of culture, all forms of charity, including ones that government cannot provide, decline.