Difference between revisions of "Talk:Line integral"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(The sentence ''A '''line integral''' is the area under a function along a specified curve.'' is still wrong, IMHO. ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Charybdis: ''90/10'' | ::Charybdis: ''90/10'' | ||
::I was already blocked two times for three days, I tread carefully... [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] | ::I was already blocked two times for three days, I tread carefully... [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The sentence ''A '''line integral''' is the area under a function along a specified curve.'' is still wrong, IMHO. [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 12:57, 26 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:57, December 26, 2009
A line integral is the area under a function along a specified curve.
I have to admit that I have great difficulties to align this description with the usual definition of a line integral, i.e., something like
<math>\int_\mathbf{C} \langle \vec{f}(\vec{s}), d\vec{s} \rangle</math>
(I used this notation to stress the scalar product)
FrankC aka ComedyFan 09:16, 26 December 2009 (EST)
- Your point is a good one. Please feel free to make such substantive improvements directly on the content page. I'll build on your point now ... in the content entry.--Andy Schlafly 09:35, 26 December 2009 (EST)
- Scylla: it is never appropriate for an editor to change the additions made by an Administrator
- Charybdis: 90/10
- I was already blocked two times for three days, I tread carefully... FrankC aka ComedyFan
The sentence A line integral is the area under a function along a specified curve. is still wrong, IMHO. FrankC aka ComedyFan 12:57, 26 December 2009 (EST)