Difference between revisions of "Homosexual denial"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (hope ed doesn't mind, just clarifying a bit)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "[[homosexual orientation]]". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument:
 
Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "[[homosexual orientation]]". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument:
−
#[[Sex]] between males is immoral
+
#[[Sex]] between members of the same gender is immoral
−
#We are males, and we are having sex
+
#We are the same gender, and we are having sex
 
#Therefore, what we are doing is immoral
 
#Therefore, what we are doing is immoral
  
 
Below, the denial consists in substituting the word ''homosexual'' or ''homosexuality'' in a misleading way:
 
Below, the denial consists in substituting the word ''homosexual'' or ''homosexuality'' in a misleading way:
−
#Homosexuality is sex between males having a [[homosexual orientation]].
+
#Homosexuality is sex between members of the same gender having a [[homosexual orientation]].
−
#We are males, and we are having sex
+
#We are the same gender, and we are having sex
 
#Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral
 
#Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral
 
#One or both of us is not "a homosexual"
 
#One or both of us is not "a homosexual"
 
No conclusion can be drawn from the premises.
 
No conclusion can be drawn from the premises.

Revision as of 23:20, December 18, 2009

Homosexual denial consists of clever verbal manipulations by homosexuals trying to seduce same-sex partners, and by advocates of homosexuality trying to trick good people into condoning homosexual relations.

In seduction, one of the most common tactics employed is to pretend that intercourse between two males (or females) isn't really homosexuality:

  • "We are just experimenting/exploring"
  • "Bi-curious"
  • What happens in prison (or on board a ship) is a "special case"

Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "homosexual orientation". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument:

  1. Sex between members of the same gender is immoral
  2. We are the same gender, and we are having sex
  3. Therefore, what we are doing is immoral

Below, the denial consists in substituting the word homosexual or homosexuality in a misleading way:

  1. Homosexuality is sex between members of the same gender having a homosexual orientation.
  2. We are the same gender, and we are having sex
  3. Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral
  4. One or both of us is not "a homosexual"

No conclusion can be drawn from the premises.