Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Featured articles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(update) |
(update) |
||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
: * Disagree. The table of contents is bloated and overgrown. For past games, there should be a table with links to separate pages for each Olympics. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:12, 27 October 2009 (EDT) | : * Disagree. The table of contents is bloated and overgrown. For past games, there should be a table with links to separate pages for each Olympics. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:12, 27 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{fa|Scientology| | {{fa|Scientology| | ||
| Line 83: | Line 80: | ||
: * Agree. Excellent and informative overview. The list would look a lot cleaner in a table, as an idea for improvement. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:05, 27 October 2009 (EDT) | : * Agree. Excellent and informative overview. The list would look a lot cleaner in a table, as an idea for improvement. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:05, 27 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
: * Agree. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:12, 7 November 2009 (EST) | : * Agree. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:12, 7 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Current article == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{fa|Tea Party Movement| | ||
| + | : * Agree! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 20:53, 21 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | : * Agree. <s>It should be shown in conjunction with the next event.</s> Retract, good boost of morale between events --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | : * Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | : * Agree. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:38, 27 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | : * Disagree. Rewrite the lead to begin with an overview of what the movement is. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:06, 27 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 95: | Line 102: | ||
The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page. | The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{fa|Church of England| | {{fa|Church of England| | ||
Revision as of 05:34, November 28, 2009
Featured articles
The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week.
Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on the talk page. Please add them to the end of the list.
Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.
- Articles listed here will be considered for featuring and voted on by the committee members. Editors may offer their own comments (on the talk page) and are welcome to help improve the listed articles!
Past articles
Featured articles. Past articles. 2007/08
Featured articles. Past articles 2009 2009
- * Agree. --Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
- * Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
|
- * Agree. --Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
- * Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
- * Agree. I love it and I will add more content.--Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
- * Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 07:59, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
|
|
|
|
Current article
|
Future articles
Proposed for featuring
The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.
New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.
The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.
|
|
|
Past Nominations
The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.