Difference between revisions of "User talk:WLink"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. | None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. | ||
| − | I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | + | I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 13:22, October 15, 2009
Don't remove factual information from Theory of Relativity. Your censorship has been reverted.--Andy Schlafly 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated.
I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? --WLink 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT)