Difference between revisions of "Questio quid juris"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new entry for this term)
 
(formatting)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
''And whan that he wel dronken hadde the wyn,
 
''And whan that he wel dronken hadde the wyn,
 +
 
Than wolde he speke no word but Latyn.
 
Than wolde he speke no word but Latyn.
 +
 
A fewe termes hadde he, two or thre,
 
A fewe termes hadde he, two or thre,
 +
 
That he had lerned out of som decree-
 
That he had lerned out of som decree-
 +
 
No wonder is, he herde it al the day,
 
No wonder is, he herde it al the day,
 +
 
And eek ye knowen wel how that a jay
 
And eek ye knowen wel how that a jay
 +
 
645 Kan clepen "Watte" as wel as kan the pope.
 
645 Kan clepen "Watte" as wel as kan the pope.
 +
 
But whoso koude in oother thyng hym grope,
 
But whoso koude in oother thyng hym grope,
 +
 
Thanne hadde he spent al his philosophie;
 
Thanne hadde he spent al his philosophie;
 +
 
Ay "Questio quid iuris" wolde he crie.''
 
Ay "Questio quid iuris" wolde he crie.''
 +
  
 
[[Category:Latin Legal Terms]]
 
[[Category:Latin Legal Terms]]

Revision as of 00:17, March 28, 2007

Questio quid juris is a Latin law term meaning roughly "I question which law [applies]." Its use dates back to the Middle Ages, and Geoffrey Chaucer, in the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales (c. 1390), has his illiterate "Summnour" (Summoner, a server of legal writs for the ecclesiastical courts) always shout out the phrase when he is drunk:

And whan that he wel dronken hadde the wyn,

Than wolde he speke no word but Latyn.

A fewe termes hadde he, two or thre,

That he had lerned out of som decree-

No wonder is, he herde it al the day,

And eek ye knowen wel how that a jay

645 Kan clepen "Watte" as wel as kan the pope.

But whoso koude in oother thyng hym grope,

Thanne hadde he spent al his philosophie;

Ay "Questio quid iuris" wolde he crie.