Difference between revisions of "Talk:Longest liberal denials"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(valid point, but) |
JLauttamus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: A valid point, but a tad nit-picky? How about "fall of communism," which is not as final as "end". It didn't merely disappear in Russia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:24, 5 March 2009 (EST) | : A valid point, but a tad nit-picky? How about "fall of communism," which is not as final as "end". It didn't merely disappear in Russia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:24, 5 March 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Very nit-picky, though I think that may be a personality flaw. I like the new version. --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 20:28, 5 March 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:28, March 6, 2009
Andy, should we specify "communism in Russia" for Reagan? There are still communist countries around, though I'm not sure if they're considered communist or socialist. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:14, 5 March 2009 (EST)
- A valid point, but a tad nit-picky? How about "fall of communism," which is not as final as "end". It didn't merely disappear in Russia.--Andy Schlafly 20:24, 5 March 2009 (EST)
- Very nit-picky, though I think that may be a personality flaw. I like the new version. --Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:28, 5 March 2009 (EST)