Difference between revisions of "User talk:FOIA"
(Very belated, it seems.) |
(→Alger Hiss: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is not about the quality of your work, but we do not allow user names consisting of all capital letters. Please think of a new username and request a bureaucrat (like [[User:Aschlafly]]) for a name change. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 8 July 2008 (EDT) | This is not about the quality of your work, but we do not allow user names consisting of all capital letters. Please think of a new username and request a bureaucrat (like [[User:Aschlafly]]) for a name change. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 8 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Alger Hiss == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is a remarkable piece of work, and I see it was nominated for 'featured article'. However, due to the large number of red links in it, is was rejected. Do you see fit to getting around to working on those, then we can re-instate it for nomination? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 18:05, 25 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:05, March 25, 2009
Welcome!
Hello, FOIA, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, FOIA!
Sorry about the hasty block. You seem to be doing good work at Alger Hiss, but one of your edit summaries was incorrect: you said you were adding "lots" of detail but only added a 3-letter acronym. --Ed Poor Talk 20:51, 30 May 2008 (EDT)
Name change
This is not about the quality of your work, but we do not allow user names consisting of all capital letters. Please think of a new username and request a bureaucrat (like User:Aschlafly) for a name change. --Ed Poor Talk 17:16, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
Alger Hiss
This is a remarkable piece of work, and I see it was nominated for 'featured article'. However, due to the large number of red links in it, is was rejected. Do you see fit to getting around to working on those, then we can re-instate it for nomination? --KotomiTnandeyanen? 18:05, 25 March 2009 (EDT)