Difference between revisions of "Talk:Immanuel Velikovsky"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(con man)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Richard, I'm wondering why you removed the "Jewish People" category from the article? --[[User:Eric2009|Eric2009]] 17:56, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 
Richard, I'm wondering why you removed the "Jewish People" category from the article? --[[User:Eric2009|Eric2009]] 17:56, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 +
::his books sold to the science fiction audience-- his "belief" in them I think was part of his game. He was not important as a Jew and doesn't deserve that category, I think. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:45, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 23:45, February 10, 2009

Not Science Fiction, just bad science. I removed the categorization as SF, because Velikovsky was serious about what he wrote. Canuck 23:22, 10 November 2008 (EST)

Agreed, his books may well be wrong, but they have never been place in the Science Fiction category, and they were never written as SF. --Eric2009 05:11, 3 February 2009 (EST)

Richard, I'm wondering why you removed the "Jewish People" category from the article? --Eric2009 17:56, 3 February 2009 (EST)

his books sold to the science fiction audience-- his "belief" in them I think was part of his game. He was not important as a Jew and doesn't deserve that category, I think. RJJensen 18:45, 10 February 2009 (EST)