Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rod Blagojevich"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(will of the people) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Overturning the will of the people, under pretext, without being convicted of any crime, before a court of law, is nothing conservatives celebrate, RJJensen. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:56, 29 January 2009 (EST) | *Overturning the will of the people, under pretext, without being convicted of any crime, before a court of law, is nothing conservatives celebrate, RJJensen. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:56, 29 January 2009 (EST) | ||
::who expresses the will of the people of Illinois in 2009? Why the legislature of course. That is a very strong American tradition since the Founding Fathers. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:38, 30 January 2009 (EST) | ::who expresses the will of the people of Illinois in 2009? Why the legislature of course. That is a very strong American tradition since the Founding Fathers. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:38, 30 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Revisionist hooey, RJ. The Founders didn't have all that much confidence in "the people". That is why they insisted upon a strong Executive, and why the Judiciary was somewhat belatedly elevated to the august third branch it is today. Weighing each tradition, I would rather have the people vote upon removal than a bunch of self-interested, politically motivated legislators. Especially when there has been absolutely no real proof of his wrong doing. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:09, 30 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 07:09, January 30, 2009
This is an encyclopedia and our credibility is at stake. Ridiculous speculation that is contradicted by the evidence is not worth reporting here--we have taped where Blogo said that Obama refused to give him anything for the Senate seat. Conservatives have to realize that getting rid of an evil scoundrel is a great achievement. RJJensen 23:41, 29 January 2009 (EST)
- Overturning the will of the people, under pretext, without being convicted of any crime, before a court of law, is nothing conservatives celebrate, RJJensen. --₮K/Admin/Talk 23:56, 29 January 2009 (EST)
- who expresses the will of the people of Illinois in 2009? Why the legislature of course. That is a very strong American tradition since the Founding Fathers. RJJensen 01:38, 30 January 2009 (EST)
- Revisionist hooey, RJ. The Founders didn't have all that much confidence in "the people". That is why they insisted upon a strong Executive, and why the Judiciary was somewhat belatedly elevated to the august third branch it is today. Weighing each tradition, I would rather have the people vote upon removal than a bunch of self-interested, politically motivated legislators. Especially when there has been absolutely no real proof of his wrong doing. --₮K/Admin/Talk 02:09, 30 January 2009 (EST)