Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pope"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:While technically, we could indeed do ''worse'', breach of copyright is bad enough. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:05, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | :While technically, we could indeed do ''worse'', breach of copyright is bad enough. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:05, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Too much negative critics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 10:53, 3 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:53, May 3, 2007
Impeccable? Do you mean infallible? Kolbe 04:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
Please include a reference or link for Dictatus Papae. Thanks! Maryanntherese 07:49, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- This article is a disgrace! It should go into the nature and history of the papacy before presuming to pass judgement on it. And it should bear in mind that far more Christians world-wide are Roman Catholic than are Protestant fundamentalists! Any volunteers? --Petrus 06:29, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
At the risk of mentioning the unmentionable, Wikipedia has an excellent page on Papal Infallibility [1]. Conservapedia could do much worse than import it wholesale! stallthedigger 11:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- While technically, we could indeed do worse, breach of copyright is bad enough. Tsumetai 11:05, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Too much negative critics.
--Joaquín Martínez 10:53, 3 May 2007 (EDT)