Difference between revisions of "Spreading"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios. | In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios. | ||
| − | + | ==See Also== | |
| + | |||
| + | [[Evolution]] | ||
[[Category:Law]] | [[Category:Law]] | ||
Revision as of 22:06, December 14, 2009
Spreading is a rhetorical strategy used by debaters, such as attorneys. The method is to overload the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
In essence, the tactic is similar to a filibuster, another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios.