Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crusade"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| − | '''I agree that this page has plenty of room for improvement. The wonderful thing about Conservapedia, is that anyone can enter information in it. Why don't you improve the Crusades page as you see fit? We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to the site. --[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 18:12, 14 December 2006 (EST)''' | + | '''I agree that this page has plenty of room for improvement. The wonderful thing about Conservapedia, is that anyone can enter information in it. Using this site is not only about getting information, but about giving to it by adding information. Why don't you improve the Crusades page as you see fit? We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to the site. --[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 18:12, 14 December 2006 (EST)''' |
Revision as of 23:21, December 14, 2006
What's with this? I don't mean to be disrespectful to this person's views, but this is supposed to be an encyclopedia. Where's the information on the crusades? If you want to express your opinion comment on a page or go to the discussion forums. I wanted to look up crusades and expected to find calm, informative, objective discriptions and definitions.
If this is how Conservapedia is going to describe the Crusades(or lack there of)I think I'll stay with Wikipedia.
I agree that this page has plenty of room for improvement. The wonderful thing about Conservapedia, is that anyone can enter information in it. Using this site is not only about getting information, but about giving to it by adding information. Why don't you improve the Crusades page as you see fit? We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to the site. --SharonS 18:12, 14 December 2006 (EST)