Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cgday"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I apologize for [[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] and [[User:Scorpionman|Scorpionman]], not everyone on the site is like that, and for that matter, not all American conservatives share the same views as him. I agree with your sentiments about the creationist bit being spelled out in the Commandments or such, and suggest you talk to [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] about doing that, though I am personally against making this a creationist site. I'm of the opinion that that's what creationwiki is for. Nevertheless, again, apologies and welcome to Conservapedia. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 07:37, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | I apologize for [[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] and [[User:Scorpionman|Scorpionman]], not everyone on the site is like that, and for that matter, not all American conservatives share the same views as him. I agree with your sentiments about the creationist bit being spelled out in the Commandments or such, and suggest you talk to [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] about doing that, though I am personally against making this a creationist site. I'm of the opinion that that's what creationwiki is for. Nevertheless, again, apologies and welcome to Conservapedia. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 07:37, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:I agree with you completely. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 17:51, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | :I agree with you completely. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 17:51, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I have to tell you, as a matter of simple logic, that abstinence really is completely effective. "Abstinence education", however, has been a terrible failure. The [[User:ASchlafly|boss]] has already eviscerated the article once.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:53, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:53, April 4, 2007
Oh knock it off. It isn't shameful. That's your ignorant opinion.Scorpionman 17:20, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
The Bible states clearly that God created languages as a response to the Tower of Babel (in about 2242 BC). Now if you want to believe that English evolved from Proto-Germanic which evolved from Proto-Indo-European which evolved from monkeys grunting at each other, that's fine, but I don't think a conservative encyclopedia should state it as fact. It's just a theory espoused by evolutionist linguists, and it should be presented as such. --Brtkrbzhnv 12:11, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
The Wonderful Welcoming Crew
I apologize for Conservateur and Scorpionman, not everyone on the site is like that, and for that matter, not all American conservatives share the same views as him. I agree with your sentiments about the creationist bit being spelled out in the Commandments or such, and suggest you talk to Aschlafly about doing that, though I am personally against making this a creationist site. I'm of the opinion that that's what creationwiki is for. Nevertheless, again, apologies and welcome to Conservapedia. ColinRtalk 07:37, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
I have to tell you, as a matter of simple logic, that abstinence really is completely effective. "Abstinence education", however, has been a terrible failure. The boss has already eviscerated the article once.--PalMDtalk 18:53, 4 April 2007 (EDT)