Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bridge to Terabithia"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(avoid wasting time here)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:LOL, that would be a valid start for ''[[Moby Dick]]''. The task then is to flesh it out. Don't waste time criticizing the shortness of an entry, when that time could be better spent doing research. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup>
 
:LOL, that would be a valid start for ''[[Moby Dick]]''. The task then is to flesh it out. Don't waste time criticizing the shortness of an entry, when that time could be better spent doing research. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup>
 +
::Haha, wonderful self-irony! You are our hero, Ed! I'm sure you watch teenager movies and give writing assignments as part of your RESEARCH! Thanks for the laugh! And for the block! --[[User:MoonPoor|MoonPoor]] 09:23, 27 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 14:23, November 27, 2008

Can you give us a clue as to who wrote it, when they wrote it, by whom it is published and what sort of age range it's aimed at...that would be a nice start.

At the moment it reads as if it's an entry for the "least informative book review of the year" prize. (If it is such an entry, where can I submit this one?: "Moby Dick: a story of several men in a boat chasing a whale.") Malakker 12:33, 14 November 2008 (EST)

LOL, that would be a valid start for Moby Dick. The task then is to flesh it out. Don't waste time criticizing the shortness of an entry, when that time could be better spent doing research. --Ed Poor Talk
Haha, wonderful self-irony! You are our hero, Ed! I'm sure you watch teenager movies and give writing assignments as part of your RESEARCH! Thanks for the laugh! And for the block! --MoonPoor 09:23, 27 November 2008 (EST)