Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rapture"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Oldoligarch (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I agree. Potty. That's why I insisted on attributing the ideas to 'some evangelical commentators' rather than, as the way of it is around here, to 'Christians'! --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 08:35, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | :I agree. Potty. That's why I insisted on attributing the ideas to 'some evangelical commentators' rather than, as the way of it is around here, to 'Christians'! --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 08:35, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oy a bruch! | ||
Revision as of 04:53, April 6, 2007
It seems that suggesting that the Pope may be the fulfillment of the condition that The Antichrist must be walking the earth in human form is unacceptable but it is OK to suggest the Euro fulfills the condition that The countries of the world must have the same currency and that the United Nations may be considered as One World Government, like the Revelation 7th beast. Surely they are equally daft and shouldn't be here either?
- "These things also belong to the wise: It is not good to show partiality in judgment." (Proverbs 24:23)
BillyBoy 06:27, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- I agree. Potty. That's why I insisted on attributing the ideas to 'some evangelical commentators' rather than, as the way of it is around here, to 'Christians'! --Petrus 08:35, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Oy a bruch!