Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Science as philosophy==
 
==Science as philosophy==
 
Science itself is ultimately philosophical.  Proof:
 
Science itself is ultimately philosophical.  Proof:
−
* Science <i>as a process</i> are the various means of experimentation, observation, and analysis leading to empirically testable claims about the physical universe;
+
* Science <i>as a process</i> includes the various means of experimentation, observation, and analysis leading to empirically testable claims about the physical universe;
−
* Philosophy is the process by which humans develop and organize their thought processes, values, and criteria for "truth," and is not empirically testable;
+
* Philosophy is the process by which humans develop and organize their thought processes, values, and criteria for "truth," which are not empirically testable;
 
* Science <i>as a process</i> as described above cannot itself be empirically tested; on the contrary, it is a human means of understanding the universe which is not empirically testable;
 
* Science <i>as a process</i> as described above cannot itself be empirically tested; on the contrary, it is a human means of understanding the universe which is not empirically testable;
 
* Therefore, science <i>as a process</i> is not itself scientific; rather, it is philosophical.
 
* Therefore, science <i>as a process</i> is not itself scientific; rather, it is philosophical.

Revision as of 03:20, October 16, 2008

Philosophy of science describes the fundamental doctrines which underlie scientific approaches to understanding the world.

Science as philosophy

Science itself is ultimately philosophical. Proof:

  • Science as a process includes the various means of experimentation, observation, and analysis leading to empirically testable claims about the physical universe;
  • Philosophy is the process by which humans develop and organize their thought processes, values, and criteria for "truth," which are not empirically testable;
  • Science as a process as described above cannot itself be empirically tested; on the contrary, it is a human means of understanding the universe which is not empirically testable;
  • Therefore, science as a process is not itself scientific; rather, it is philosophical.


For a primer on the subject, see Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions