Difference between revisions of "Talk:William Ayers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(removed profanity) |
(→Re: removed section: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Because, Scorpion, there was never sufficient evidence to convict him or anyone else of bombings claimed by the Weather Underground. | Because, Scorpion, there was never sufficient evidence to convict him or anyone else of bombings claimed by the Weather Underground. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Re: removed section == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I removed the following section: | ||
| + | :<nowiki>Obama has been very unwilling to discuss Ayers for fear that their relationship will scare away swing voters, and the [[Liberal|liberal]] [[Liberal media|media]] have been very complicit in [[Deceit|whitewashing]] their relationship.<ref>http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77075</ref></nowiki> | ||
| + | The first part states as fact something that only Obama knows, and the second part is hardly verified by the source. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:16, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:16, October 25, 2008
I removed the Hillary quote because the section's introductory paragraph covers everything she said, and in a much more detailed manner. Jirby 23:25, 24 August 2008 (EDT)
- Why the H--- is this guy not in prison??? ScorpionVote for Pedro 22:49, 4 October 2008 (EDT
Because, Scorpion, there was never sufficient evidence to convict him or anyone else of bombings claimed by the Weather Underground.
Re: removed section
I removed the following section:
- Obama has been very unwilling to discuss Ayers for fear that their relationship will scare away swing voters, and the [[Liberal|liberal]] [[Liberal media|media]] have been very complicit in [[Deceit|whitewashing]] their relationship.<ref>http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77075</ref>
The first part states as fact something that only Obama knows, and the second part is hardly verified by the source. HelpJazz 22:16, 24 October 2008 (EDT)