Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obama syndrome"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Bad wording?: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Because he is a well spoken fellow with nice teeth. And that is what interests the voting public. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 13:32, 30 September 2008 (EDT) | :Because he is a well spoken fellow with nice teeth. And that is what interests the voting public. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 13:32, 30 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Can anyone provide any actual proof of this or is this just another "just for fun" posts? [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 13:36, 30 September 2008 (EDT) | ::Can anyone provide any actual proof of this or is this just another "just for fun" posts? [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 13:36, 30 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Bad wording? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article gives the impression of Conservapedia trying to defend Obama. Should the wording be changed into "On wikis like Conservapedia, '''vandals''' try to..." | ||
Revision as of 18:05, September 30, 2008
I wonder, if they like Obama regardless of his stance, then why do they like him? HelpJazz 13:12, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
- Because he is a well spoken fellow with nice teeth. And that is what interests the voting public. Sideways 13:32, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
- Can anyone provide any actual proof of this or is this just another "just for fun" posts? NateE Let Us Communicate 13:36, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
Bad wording?
This article gives the impression of Conservapedia trying to defend Obama. Should the wording be changed into "On wikis like Conservapedia, vandals try to..."