Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''[[Philosophy]] of [[science]]''' describes the fundamental doctrines which underlie scientific approaches to understanding the world. For a primer on the subject, see Thomas Kuhn's ''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''
+
'''[[Philosophy]] of [[science]]''' describes the fundamental doctrines which underlie scientific approaches to understanding the world.  
 +
 
 +
==Science as philosophy==
 +
Science itself is ultimately philosophical.  Proof:
 +
* Science <i>as a process</i> are the various means of experimentation, observation, and analysis leading to empirically testable claims about the physical universe;
 +
* Philosophy is the process by which humans develop and organize their thought processes, values, and criteria for "truth," and is not empirically testable;
 +
* Science <i>as a process</i> as described above cannot itself be empirically tested; on the contrary, it is a human means of understanding the universe which is not empirically testable;
 +
* Therefore, science <i>as a process</i> is not itself scientific; rather, it is philosophical.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
For a primer on the subject, see Thomas Kuhn's ''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''
 
[[Category: Science]]
 
[[Category: Science]]
 
[[Category: Philosophy]]
 
[[Category: Philosophy]]

Revision as of 03:20, October 16, 2008

Philosophy of science describes the fundamental doctrines which underlie scientific approaches to understanding the world.

Science as philosophy

Science itself is ultimately philosophical. Proof:

  • Science as a process are the various means of experimentation, observation, and analysis leading to empirically testable claims about the physical universe;
  • Philosophy is the process by which humans develop and organize their thought processes, values, and criteria for "truth," and is not empirically testable;
  • Science as a process as described above cannot itself be empirically tested; on the contrary, it is a human means of understanding the universe which is not empirically testable;
  • Therefore, science as a process is not itself scientific; rather, it is philosophical.


For a primer on the subject, see Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions