Difference between revisions of "User:HelpJazz"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(somewhat new me; somewhat new userpage)
m
Line 21: Line 21:
 
*I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
 
*I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
 
*I will never block someone for violating the [[90/10 rule]]
 
*I will never block someone for violating the [[90/10 rule]]
−
*I will never block someone who has had no edits
+
*I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
 
*I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
 
*I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
 
*The worse that can ever happen to me is I will get blocked
 
*The worse that can ever happen to me is I will get blocked

Revision as of 22:23, September 13, 2008

HelpJazz
3,000 This user has made over 3,000 edits to Conservapedia
Forever Stamp.jpg This user is a libertarian.
•
PolCompass.gif
This user's Political Compass coordinates are 5.00,-2.92.
CivicCrown.jpg
This user supports an autonomous collective as the rightful leader of Conservapedia.
HelpJazz is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted Banhammer barnstar for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!

My Editing Philosophy

  • Noncontroversial edits are usually ok
  • I will always follow the Guidelines and Commandments
  • I won't change work from the editors who are never wrong, unless I really, really, really know what I am doing
  • I won't edit or comment on essay pages; they are supposed to be opinion
  • I will point out and correct when an article is unencyclopedic, but will back down when defending my action is futile
  • I will point out and correct when an article does not follow the Guidelines or Commandments, but will back down when defending my action is futile
  • I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
  • I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words
  • There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people
  • I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself)
  • I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
  • I will never block someone for violating the 90/10 rule
  • I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
  • I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
  • The worse that can ever happen to me is I will get blocked

Some who think they are more rational than me may say that I'm a wimp for backing down. I say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result.

About Me

Subs: /chemredlinks, /Contest, /refs, /workspace, /chemeng