Difference between revisions of "User talk:JBrandonLoberg"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
While CP excepts liberal editors, your edits are questionable.-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 17:54, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 
While CP excepts liberal editors, your edits are questionable.-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 17:54, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Conservapedia is not in business to exalt [[anarchism]]. Be warned. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 06:14, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Conservapedia is not in business to exalt [[anarchism]]. Be warned. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 06:14, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
::I didn't see anything all that bad with it. In the future, it's best to make several small edits and put a descriptive edit comment in each one. Otherwise the entire edit will be reverted, since most people are too lazy to revert just the offending part. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:47, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:47, September 13, 2008

While CP excepts liberal editors, your edits are questionable.-- 50 star flag.png jp 17:54, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Conservapedia is not in business to exalt anarchism. Be warned. Bugler 06:14, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
I didn't see anything all that bad with it. In the future, it's best to make several small edits and put a descriptive edit comment in each one. Otherwise the entire edit will be reverted, since most people are too lazy to revert just the offending part. HelpJazz 12:47, 13 September 2008 (EDT)