Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pro-drilling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Generally agreed.) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That seems to be the smallest of this article's problems. Anyone want to rewrite it in something more closely resembling English? [[User:Human|Human]] 17:08, 29 August 2008 (EDT) | :That seems to be the smallest of this article's problems. Anyone want to rewrite it in something more closely resembling English? [[User:Human|Human]] 17:08, 29 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
::It seems to be "all ''of the'' above", actually. And while I think your last remark went a bit far, this article '''does''' need some rewriting. Aside from some grammar, there is also unnecessary opinion-pushing in the middle, and the article seems to be a collection of random ideas. I'll see if I can dig out some sources (this isn't really my special field) later today or tomorrow. But if others want to fix this sooner, be my guest. Do we have some sort of "Needs work plz" template? --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 17:16, 29 August 2008 (EDT) | ::It seems to be "all ''of the'' above", actually. And while I think your last remark went a bit far, this article '''does''' need some rewriting. Aside from some grammar, there is also unnecessary opinion-pushing in the middle, and the article seems to be a collection of random ideas. I'll see if I can dig out some sources (this isn't really my special field) later today or tomorrow. But if others want to fix this sooner, be my guest. Do we have some sort of "Needs work plz" template? --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 17:16, 29 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Human, trying being more humane instead of publicly complaining. Why don't you make the needed corrections, contribute more new articles and move on. Your attitude is proving valid with #15 and #20 of [[Essay:Liberal_Behavior_on_Conservapedia]]. -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 17:27, 29 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:27, August 29, 2008
Shouldn't the saying be "all the above"? Human 17:05, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
- That seems to be the smallest of this article's problems. Anyone want to rewrite it in something more closely resembling English? Human 17:08, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
- It seems to be "all of the above", actually. And while I think your last remark went a bit far, this article does need some rewriting. Aside from some grammar, there is also unnecessary opinion-pushing in the middle, and the article seems to be a collection of random ideas. I'll see if I can dig out some sources (this isn't really my special field) later today or tomorrow. But if others want to fix this sooner, be my guest. Do we have some sort of "Needs work plz" template? --DirkB 17:16, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
- Human, trying being more humane instead of publicly complaining. Why don't you make the needed corrections, contribute more new articles and move on. Your attitude is proving valid with #15 and #20 of Essay:Liberal_Behavior_on_Conservapedia. --
jp 17:27, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
- Human, trying being more humane instead of publicly complaining. Why don't you make the needed corrections, contribute more new articles and move on. Your attitude is proving valid with #15 and #20 of Essay:Liberal_Behavior_on_Conservapedia. --
