Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vote"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(My reasoning exactly) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't this quite specific? Seems "vote" is a concept that is used world wide in many contexts, not just senate vote. Perhaps the title should be changed? Michelle.--[[User:MHayes|MHayes]] 18:04, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | Isn't this quite specific? Seems "vote" is a concept that is used world wide in many contexts, not just senate vote. Perhaps the title should be changed? Michelle.--[[User:MHayes|MHayes]] 18:04, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:My reasoning exactly. I also don't think that such a tiny detail about the Senate requires its own article, so I simply merged the article's content into [[United States Senate]] and replaced this one with a more general version. It's not exactly Featured Article material, but it's a start people can build up on. :) --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 18:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | :My reasoning exactly. I also don't think that such a tiny detail about the Senate requires its own article, so I simply merged the article's content into [[United States Senate]] and replaced this one with a more general version. It's not exactly Featured Article material, but it's a start people can build up on. :) --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 18:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::good deal. I get hum... hesitant... to change things like this, cause CP has a few sysops who are, in my view, overboard in their approach to how editors work. So I leave lots of comments on Talk pages, till someone who has been here long enough either says "ah, good thought,,, do it" or does it. ;-) Michelle.--[[User:MHayes|MHayes]] 18:21, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:21, August 27, 2008
Isn't this quite specific? Seems "vote" is a concept that is used world wide in many contexts, not just senate vote. Perhaps the title should be changed? Michelle.--MHayes 18:04, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- My reasoning exactly. I also don't think that such a tiny detail about the Senate requires its own article, so I simply merged the article's content into United States Senate and replaced this one with a more general version. It's not exactly Featured Article material, but it's a start people can build up on. :) --DirkB 18:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- good deal. I get hum... hesitant... to change things like this, cause CP has a few sysops who are, in my view, overboard in their approach to how editors work. So I leave lots of comments on Talk pages, till someone who has been here long enough either says "ah, good thought,,, do it" or does it. ;-) Michelle.--MHayes 18:21, 27 August 2008 (EDT)