Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chimpanzee"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:there it's gone --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:there it's gone --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[user:Conservative|Conservative]], cited sources are not "babble."  If you disagree with them, debate it here with people who have studied up on it.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:38, March 20, 2007

Great article, hope it lasts. Palmd001 23:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --Crackertalk 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
there it's gone --Crackertalk 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Conservative, cited sources are not "babble." If you disagree with them, debate it here with people who have studied up on it.--AmesG 23:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)