Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stephanie Tubbs Jones"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I think you missed the point. If you look at the ref, she took more from them than anyone else at a time when the industry likely needed all the favors it could get. You are denying the reality of the situation. [[User:LarryHapp|LarryHapp]] 12:39, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 
I think you missed the point. If you look at the ref, she took more from them than anyone else at a time when the industry likely needed all the favors it could get. You are denying the reality of the situation. [[User:LarryHapp|LarryHapp]] 12:39, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I think you are missing some critical information.  It's not just the "Real Estate" sector, but "Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate sector".  If you follow your link just one step further, you get a better breakdown of how much she took from the Real Estate sector: $14,000.  This compares to, in that sector only, $26,158 from Commercial Banks, $27,000 from Securities and Investments, and $71,875 from Insurance.  So really, the Real Estate sector accounted for only 2.7% of the PAC money she took that year.  Interesting what you find when you actually research a topic. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 12:47, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:47, August 21, 2008

There's no reason to be rude about it. If you disagree, just explain why. I'll be happy to discuss this issue with you. LarryHapp 12:27, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Jareddr is a apologist for corrupt liberals. Well known for deletions without discussion first.-- 50 star flag.png jp 12:29, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Explain to me how a politician taking contributions is noteworthy. Was she supposed to forgo any contributions during a housing crisis? Have any GOP politicians forgone contributions during the housing crisis? --Jareddr 12:31, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

I think you missed the point. If you look at the ref, she took more from them than anyone else at a time when the industry likely needed all the favors it could get. You are denying the reality of the situation. LarryHapp 12:39, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

I think you are missing some critical information. It's not just the "Real Estate" sector, but "Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate sector". If you follow your link just one step further, you get a better breakdown of how much she took from the Real Estate sector: $14,000. This compares to, in that sector only, $26,158 from Commercial Banks, $27,000 from Securities and Investments, and $71,875 from Insurance. So really, the Real Estate sector accounted for only 2.7% of the PAC money she took that year. Interesting what you find when you actually research a topic. --Jareddr 12:47, 21 August 2008 (EDT)