Difference between revisions of "Talk:Birth control pill"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by AodhMor (Talk); changed back to last version by TheGySom)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
::::[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article2434694.ece This] study rejects any link of the pills to an increase in cancer, but supports a link to a decrease in cancer. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 23:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::::[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article2434694.ece This] study rejects any link of the pills to an increase in cancer, but supports a link to a decrease in cancer. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 23:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
−
 
−
Guys, it doesn't matter what the research says.  All that matters is that some conservatives think contraception encourages sex, despite little evidence, so they'll come up with any scare story they can think of about it.  [[User:AodhMor|AodhMor]] 11:47, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 21:28, May 13, 2008

Cancer Causing

How? TheGySom 23:06, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

The pill is a carcinogen.--Aschlafly 23:06, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
Could you please elaborate a little, this is an important point which needs to be expanded. TheGySom 23:07, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
According to this the pill increases the risk of some cancers but decreases the risk of others, perhaps this could be clarified. TheGySom 23:09, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
And not all of "the pills" are diethylstilbestrol, right? Fuzzy|AFD 23:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
This study rejects any link of the pills to an increase in cancer, but supports a link to a decrease in cancer. TheGySom 23:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)