Difference between revisions of "Springer v. Henry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This decision was extraordinary in affirming a large award by a physician against a state governmental entity. | This decision was extraordinary in affirming a large award by a physician against a state governmental entity. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Circuit Cases]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Third Circuit]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:First Amendment]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Section 1983]] |
Latest revision as of 06:58, June 27, 2016
In, Springer v. Henry, 435 F.3d 268, 271 (3d Cir. 2006), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a million-dollar jury award against a Delaware psychiatric for retaliating against a staff physician for exercising his First Amendment rights in criticizing patient care at the State hospital.
This decision was extraordinary in affirming a large award by a physician against a state governmental entity.