Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Novels"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dadsnagem2 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | :Not all books are novels. I think | + | :Not all books are novels. I think it's a useful sub-category. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT) |
::That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ::That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::Novels is a sub-category of Fiction which is a sub-category of Books. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:29, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | :::Novels is a sub-category of Fiction which is a sub-category of Books. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:29, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::::Not my call, but I think the current scheme makes sense. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:50, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | :::::Not my call, but I think the current scheme makes sense. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:50, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::::How does having some fiction novels in one category and some in another with no overlap make sense? [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 18:03, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ::::::How does having some fiction novels in one category and some in another with no overlap make sense? [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 18:03, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::::::It doesn't. All novels should be in the category Novels. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 22:40, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:40, April 30, 2008
This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. IndianaJ 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Not all books are novels. I think it's a useful sub-category. Dadsnagem2 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. IndianaJ 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Novels is a sub-category of Fiction which is a sub-category of Books. Dadsnagem2 17:29, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Deliciously convulted. Shall we go about moving fictional entries from Books to Novels, then? IndianaJ 17:46, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Not my call, but I think the current scheme makes sense. Dadsnagem2 17:50, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- How does having some fiction novels in one category and some in another with no overlap make sense? IndianaJ 18:03, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- It doesn't. All novels should be in the category Novels. Dadsnagem2 22:40, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- How does having some fiction novels in one category and some in another with no overlap make sense? IndianaJ 18:03, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Not my call, but I think the current scheme makes sense. Dadsnagem2 17:50, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Deliciously convulted. Shall we go about moving fictional entries from Books to Novels, then? IndianaJ 17:46, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Novels is a sub-category of Fiction which is a sub-category of Books. Dadsnagem2 17:29, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. IndianaJ 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)