Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Novels"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
 
This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
:Not all books are novels. I think its a useful sub-category. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:24, April 29, 2008

This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. IndianaJ 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Not all books are novels. I think its a useful sub-category. Dadsnagem2 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)