Difference between revisions of "Liberal gullibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(no seriously believes that riding guns will stop all crime) |
(Thought of some more. This page could get really long!) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are | * the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are | ||
* the [[Piltdown Man]] is the missing link, and so was the [[Nebraska Man]]! | * the [[Piltdown Man]] is the missing link, and so was the [[Nebraska Man]]! | ||
| + | * Liberals will believe anything that Obama tells them, yet accuse Christians of having "blind faith" | ||
| + | *Liberals believe that Obama has no connections to Islam whatsoever | ||
| + | *Libeals oppose the War on Terrorism, but want us to intervene in Darfur. | ||
(add more) | (add more) | ||
[[category:psychology]] | [[category:psychology]] | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 02:48, April 26, 2008
Liberal gullibility is the tendency of some people to believe false liberal claims. Michael Moore makes a fortune of liberal gullibility; Al Gore won a Nobel Prize from it.
Examples of liberal gullibility include:
- taking away guns will prevent gun crime
- global warming must be caused by man
- providing government health care for all will reduce illness
- government programs can reduce poverty by giving more money away
- the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are
- the Piltdown Man is the missing link, and so was the Nebraska Man!
- Liberals will believe anything that Obama tells them, yet accuse Christians of having "blind faith"
- Liberals believe that Obama has no connections to Islam whatsoever
- Libeals oppose the War on Terrorism, but want us to intervene in Darfur.
(add more)