Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arguments about evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Thought of a better word. Zing.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey Jellyfish, care to say why you dismissed and reverted my edit as "nonsense"? --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 16:48, 20 April 2008 (EDT) | Hey Jellyfish, care to say why you dismissed and reverted my edit as "nonsense"? --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 16:48, 20 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Hi, Autofire. Sorry about that, I got carried away after reverting an endless production line of vandals. But unless I'm mistaken, didn't your edit argue that the link between Evolutionism and Social Darwinism was unsound or something? I would have thought that link was self-evident, and it seems to be prefectly in line with the official viewpoint of this site. Am I missing something? '''<font color="impossibletouse" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Jellyfish|Jellyfish!]]</font>''' 16:51, 20 April 2008 (EDT) | :Hi, Autofire. Sorry about that, I got carried away after reverting an endless production line of vandals. But unless I'm mistaken, didn't your edit argue that the link between Evolutionism and Social Darwinism was unsound or something? I would have thought that link was self-evident, and it seems to be prefectly in line with the official viewpoint of this site. Am I missing something? '''<font color="impossibletouse" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Jellyfish|Jellyfish!]]</font>''' 16:51, 20 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::My edit argued that the theory of evolution did not ''necessitate'' SD; rather, SD was the result of people misusing the theory to justify their racist ideas. I say "misusing" because the theory of evolution itself does not advocate mass murder/genocide. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 16:55, 20 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:55, April 20, 2008
Hey Jellyfish, care to say why you dismissed and reverted my edit as "nonsense"? --transResident Transfanform! 16:48, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Hi, Autofire. Sorry about that, I got carried away after reverting an endless production line of vandals. But unless I'm mistaken, didn't your edit argue that the link between Evolutionism and Social Darwinism was unsound or something? I would have thought that link was self-evident, and it seems to be prefectly in line with the official viewpoint of this site. Am I missing something? Jellyfish! 16:51, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- My edit argued that the theory of evolution did not necessitate SD; rather, SD was the result of people misusing the theory to justify their racist ideas. I say "misusing" because the theory of evolution itself does not advocate mass murder/genocide. --transResident Transfanform! 16:55, 20 April 2008 (EDT)