Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sexually Transmitted Disease"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
I hope you don't mind the formatting I did, Palm.  It was just looking a little cluttered.  Probably like clearing the deck chairs on the Titanic as I don't think this article will be allowed to stay. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 15:58, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I hope you don't mind the formatting I did, Palm.  It was just looking a little cluttered.  Probably like clearing the deck chairs on the Titanic as I don't think this article will be allowed to stay. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 15:58, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I appreciate the assistance.  I am having an ongoing discussion with Mr. Schalfly about my qualifications to comment on these matters.  He contends that a professor of internal medicine is not qualified in STDs.  I think he's believing what he wants, deluded, on crack, or all of the above, but I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Revision as of 20:22, March 16, 2007

I hate to sound paranoid, so if i do, sorry. I tried to make this contribution informative, clean, moral, and factual. I think it is valuable. Please do not dismiss it out of hand. As I've said before, the subject may be distasteful, but the treatment of it is quite moral. Just because Satan is evil doesn't mean we don't have an entry about him.


Thanks Niandra. Palmd001 14:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

I agree. Ive seen the effects on culture when people are denied proper knowledge of the dangers of STIs - mass promiscuity, corruption, casual sex, I saw it all when I was in school years ago. Taboo as it is, people need to know this.

-- BornAgainBrit

Formatting

I hope you don't mind the formatting I did, Palm. It was just looking a little cluttered. Probably like clearing the deck chairs on the Titanic as I don't think this article will be allowed to stay. Myk 15:58, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

I appreciate the assistance. I am having an ongoing discussion with Mr. Schalfly about my qualifications to comment on these matters. He contends that a professor of internal medicine is not qualified in STDs. I think he's believing what he wants, deluded, on crack, or all of the above, but I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt.