Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Liberals"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎What belongs here?: new section)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Being nice to each other==
 
==Being nice to each other==
 
Then do you disagree about [[the Greatest Commandment]] being applicable, and seeing to cut against your behavior here?-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 20:37, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
 
Then do you disagree about [[the Greatest Commandment]] being applicable, and seeing to cut against your behavior here?-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 20:37, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== What belongs here? ==
 +
 +
I'm guessing, since this category is called "liberals", that it is only designed for ''people''. Non-people probably fit better into the category [[:Category:Liberalism]], correct? I'm going to start fixing this category. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:57, 16 November 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 23:57, November 16, 2008

I propose a new page, called Liberal generalizations. The content should go something like this:

“ Liberals tend to make gross over-generalizations of their ideological opponents, attributing grossly unfavorable qualities to them and demonizing conservatives as incapable of feeling friendship. On the contrary, there is no known example of conservatives over-generalizing and demonizing liberals. ”

Tell me what you think.-αmεσ (advocate) 13:59, 8 March 2008 (EST)

Being nice to each other

Then do you disagree about the Greatest Commandment being applicable, and seeing to cut against your behavior here?-PhoenixWright 20:37, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

What belongs here?

I'm guessing, since this category is called "liberals", that it is only designed for people. Non-people probably fit better into the category Category:Liberalism, correct? I'm going to start fixing this category. HelpJazz 18:57, 16 November 2008 (EST)