Difference between revisions of "Debate:Bias in conservapedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MountainDew (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Opportunity for Debate == | == Opportunity for Debate == | ||
This seems like a good place to begin a discussion of why some views must go unchallenged on this site. For example, if one feels that a subject like George W. Bush is complete, that is, not needing any further information, then by all means--lock it. Unfortunately, many of these instances smack of censorship of the truth. Shouldn't some of the controversy surrounding the president be addressed? Or, is Conservapedia really just a forum for unchecked, unquestioning dogma? I just think we need to talk. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 16:50, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | This seems like a good place to begin a discussion of why some views must go unchallenged on this site. For example, if one feels that a subject like George W. Bush is complete, that is, not needing any further information, then by all means--lock it. Unfortunately, many of these instances smack of censorship of the truth. Shouldn't some of the controversy surrounding the president be addressed? Or, is Conservapedia really just a forum for unchecked, unquestioning dogma? I just think we need to talk. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 16:50, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reason for locking== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It was locked because of persistent vandalism. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 16:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:51, March 15, 2007
Opportunity for Debate
This seems like a good place to begin a discussion of why some views must go unchallenged on this site. For example, if one feels that a subject like George W. Bush is complete, that is, not needing any further information, then by all means--lock it. Unfortunately, many of these instances smack of censorship of the truth. Shouldn't some of the controversy surrounding the president be addressed? Or, is Conservapedia really just a forum for unchecked, unquestioning dogma? I just think we need to talk. Menkatron 16:50, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
Reason for locking
It was locked because of persistent vandalism. MountainDew 16:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)