Difference between revisions of "User:Smallguy"
(→List: reply) |
(→List) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This should be moved to your talk page, but for now I can observe that at least 5 out of the 11 had privileges revoked. It's not our policy to discuss or disclose further information. For most of the remaining 6, the cited inactivities are not particularly striking.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:30, 23 February 2008 (EST) | This should be moved to your talk page, but for now I can observe that at least 5 out of the 11 had privileges revoked. It's not our policy to discuss or disclose further information. For most of the remaining 6, the cited inactivities are not particularly striking.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:30, 23 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :Much obliged! I will be sure to note all you've told me in my article. Thanks for the time, --[[User:Smallguy|Smallguy]] 20:35, 23 February 2008 (EST) | ||
==Part 2== | ==Part 2== | ||
Revision as of 01:35, February 24, 2008
I'm pretty much doing a journalism project - I did a similar thing on Wikipedia, and I'd like to compare to Conservapedia. I'll be finding out how many sysops have retired (and thus what percentage).
List
- User:Will N. - last edit: November 2007
- User:TK - last edit: January 2008
- User:Hojimachong - last edit: October 2007
- User:Bohdan - last edit: February 2008 (on and off)
- User:DeborahB. - last edit: December 2007
- User:ColinR - last edit: May 2007
- User:CollegeRepublican - last edit: December 2007
- User:Elamdri - last edit: August 2007
- User:Sarah B - last edit: January 2007
- User:Tmtoulouse - last edit: May 2007
- User:Richard - last edit: May 2007
Percentage of inactive sysops: 11/(28+11)= 28% Note: waiting on double checking
This should be moved to your talk page, but for now I can observe that at least 5 out of the 11 had privileges revoked. It's not our policy to discuss or disclose further information. For most of the remaining 6, the cited inactivities are not particularly striking.--Aschlafly 20:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- Much obliged! I will be sure to note all you've told me in my article. Thanks for the time, --Smallguy 20:35, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Part 2
I'll also be checking how experienced Conservapedian sysops were when elected (and try and compare this to Wikipedian sysops). This might be harder to do given that Conservapedia lacks an organized sysop system; however I can try using the list of users with the sysop templates and the above. (rounded up)
- User:Will N.- date when elected: May 2007; edits @ time: 776
- User:Hojimachong - date elected: March 2007; edits: 1506
- User:TK - date: March 2007; edits: 739
- User:Bohdan - May;2007; 1900
- User:DeborahB. - June 2007; 1618
- User:CollegeRepublican - 0
- User:ColinR - 660
- User:Sarah B - 119
- User:Elamdri - 757
Average so far: 897