Difference between revisions of "Talk:Londonderry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
IrishBeryl (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Courts matter more than people? Not a very conservative outlook, I would say. That being the case, I guess Americans shouldn't do anything re: Roe v. Wade as the courts have already decided the issue. [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 15:55, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ::Courts matter more than people? Not a very conservative outlook, I would say. That being the case, I guess Americans shouldn't do anything re: Roe v. Wade as the courts have already decided the issue. [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 15:55, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Given the sensitivites - which are mentioned in the article, indeed - it seems a shame to appear so one-sided, especially when there is a very easy, ''fair'', ''balanced'' and ''conservative'' solution so close at hand! [[User:IrishBeryl|IrishBeryl]] 15:58, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:58, February 16, 2008
Merge with Derry?
Surely must be done - but I hesitate to select the most appropriate name! IrishBeryl 16:57, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- article title 'Derry/Londonderry' should do it. Sawneybeane 07:27, 16 February 2008 (EST)
why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? Rodney 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST)
Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? IrishBeryl 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- Courts matter more than people? Not a very conservative outlook, I would say. That being the case, I guess Americans shouldn't do anything re: Roe v. Wade as the courts have already decided the issue. Rodney 15:55, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- Given the sensitivites - which are mentioned in the article, indeed - it seems a shame to appear so one-sided, especially when there is a very easy, fair, balanced and conservative solution so close at hand! IrishBeryl 15:58, 16 February 2008 (EST)