Difference between revisions of "Talk:Londonderry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
IrishBeryl (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST) | why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
<br />Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? [[User:IrishBeryl|IrishBeryl]] 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST) | <br />Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? [[User:IrishBeryl|IrishBeryl]] 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::The name was determined as Londonderry in the most recent court ruling. If/when the courts rule otherwise, it can be moved. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:54, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:54, February 16, 2008
Merge with Derry?
Surely must be done - but I hesitate to select the most appropriate name! IrishBeryl 16:57, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- article title 'Derry/Londonderry' should do it. Sawneybeane 07:27, 16 February 2008 (EST)
why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? Rodney 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST)
Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? IrishBeryl 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST)
